AthletesTeams
Kipchoge vs Kipyegon
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
KipchogeWinner
92.0Kipchoge wins: Dominance, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Kipyegon
89.5Kipyegon wins: no category outright
Candidates
Locked to AthleticsShareable URL · /compare/kipchoge-vs-faith-kipyegon
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇰🇪 Eliud Kipchoge
92.0
Kipchoge leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Eliud Kipchoge
2. Faith Kipyegon
Category breakdown
Season form · Major golds per season
Career timeline · Major golds per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Major golds per season1. 🇰🇪 Eliud Kipchoge5 seasons played · career day 5,84337,314 major golds
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇰🇪 Faith Kipyegon5 seasons played · career day 3,2861,179.6 major golds
-96.8% vs Kipchoge at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇰🇪 Kipchoge | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 🇰🇪 Kipyegon | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 239 | 1,179.59 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | KipchogeActive | KipyegonActive |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 2 | 3 |
| Major marathon wins | 11 | — |
| Marathon world record (s) | 7,299 | — |
| Sub-2 hour exhibitions | 1 | — |
| World Championship golds | 1 | 3 |
| Berlin Marathon wins | 5 | — |
| World records | — | 3 |
| 1500 m world record (s) | — | 209.63 |
| Mile world record (s) | — | 246.95 |
| Diamond League titles | — | 5 |
| Dominance w25% | 92 | 90 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 90 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 91 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 93 | 92 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Kipchoge92.0
Kipyegon89.5
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Kipchoge vs Kipyegon. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.