Who is better, Thompson or Johnston?
Klay Thompson leads with a GOAT score of 82.3 against 82.3 for Neil Johnston — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Klay Thompson and Neil Johnston level at 82.3. Klay Thompson leads on Longevity, Honours. Neil Johnston leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Thompson wins: Longevity, Honours
Johnston wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/klay-thompson-vs-neil-johnston
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Thompson leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Thompson | 0 | 0 | 12.5 | 29.1 | 91.3 | 155.1 |
| 🇺🇸 Johnston | 0 | 0 | 6 | 28.3 | 96.5 | 160.9 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ThompsonActive · Miami Heat | JohnstonRetired |
|---|---|---|
| NBA titles | 4 | 1 |
| All-Star selections | 5 | 6 |
| Three-pointers in a game record | 14 | — |
| Points in a quarter record | 37 | — |
| Career three-pointers | 2,400 | — |
| Scoring titles | — | 3 |
| Career points per game | — | 19.4 |
| Rebounding titles | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 62 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 88 |
Klay Thompson leads with a GOAT score of 82.3 against 82.3 for Neil Johnston — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Johnston scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Thompson leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Thompson: 82.3, Johnston: 82.3.
Make your case for Thompson vs Johnston. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.