Who is better, knight or SumaiL?
Zhuo "knight" Ding leads with a GOAT score of 84.2 against 84.2 for Sumail "SumaiL" Hassan — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Zhuo "knight" Ding and Sumail "SumaiL" Hassan level at 84.2. Zhuo "knight" Ding leads on Dominance, Statistics. Sumail "SumaiL" Hassan leads on Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →knight wins: Dominance, Statistics
SumaiL wins: Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/knight-lol-vs-sumail-dota
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
knight leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇳 knight | 0 | 0 | 68 | 146 | 404 | 764 |
| 🇵🇰 SumaiL | 0 | 0 | 70 | 166 | 420 | 722 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | knightActive | SumaiLActive |
|---|---|---|
| Mid-Season Invitational titles | 1 | — |
| LPL titles | 3 | — |
| LPL MVP awards | 2 | — |
| World Championship appearances | 5 | — |
| Professional seasons | 9 | 11 |
| The International titles | — | 1 |
| Major titles | — | 3 |
| The International appearances | — | 7 |
| Career prize money (USD m) | — | 3.6 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 84 |
Zhuo "knight" Ding leads with a GOAT score of 84.2 against 84.2 for Sumail "SumaiL" Hassan — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
SumaiL scores higher on peak, honours. knight leads on dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. knight: 84.2, SumaiL: 84.2.
Make your case for knight vs SumaiL. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.