Who is better, Koke or Fischer?
Koke Resurrección leads with a GOAT score of 82.8 against 82.8 for Nilla Fischer — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Koke Resurrección and Nilla Fischer level at 82.8. Koke Resurrección leads on Dominance. Nilla Fischer leads on Honours, Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Koke wins: Dominance
Fischer wins: Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/koke-atletico-vs-nilla-fischer
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Koke leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇪🇸 Koke | 0 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 276 | 618 |
| 🇸🇪 Fischer | 0 | 0 | 8 | 22 | 82 | 165 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | KokeActive | FischerRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Appearances for Atlético de Madrid | 690 | — |
| La Liga titles | 2 | — |
| Europa League titles | 2 | — |
| Copa del Rey titles | 1 | — |
| Spain caps | 70 | — |
| Sweden caps | — | 194 |
| Olympic silver medals | — | 2 |
| Bundesliga titles | — | 4 |
| Champions League finals | — | 3 |
| Swedish Footballer of the Year awards | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 84 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 76 | 78 |
Koke Resurrección leads with a GOAT score of 82.8 against 82.8 for Nilla Fischer — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Fischer scores higher on honours, statistics, longevity. Koke leads on dominance.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Koke: 82.8, Fischer: 82.8.
Make your case for Koke vs Fischer. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.