Who is better, Koke or Mijatović?
Koke Resurrección leads with a GOAT score of 82.8 against 82.8 for Predrag Mijatović — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Koke Resurrección and Predrag Mijatović level at 82.8. Koke Resurrección leads on Longevity, Dominance. Predrag Mijatović leads on Statistics, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Koke wins: Dominance, Longevity
Mijatović wins: Peak, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/koke-atletico-vs-predrag-mijatovic
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Koke leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇪🇸 Koke | 0 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 276 | 618 |
| 🇲🇪 Mijatović | 0 | 0 | 50 | 105 | 300 | 634 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | KokeActive | MijatovićRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Appearances for Atlético de Madrid | 690 | — |
| La Liga titles | 2 | 1 |
| Europa League titles | 2 | — |
| Copa del Rey titles | 1 | — |
| Spain caps | 70 | — |
| Champions League titles | — | 1 |
| Intercontinental Cup titles | — | 1 |
| Career goals | — | 214 |
| Yugoslavia caps | — | 73 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 76 | 86 |
Koke Resurrección leads with a GOAT score of 82.8 against 82.8 for Predrag Mijatović — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Mijatović scores higher on peak, honours, statistics. Koke leads on dominance, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Koke: 82.8, Mijatović: 82.8.
Make your case for Koke vs Mijatović. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.