GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Niwa vs Chen Meng

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
NiwaWinner
78.5

Niwa wins: Longevity

Chen Meng
78.3

Chen Meng wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Table Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/koki-niwa-vs-chen-meng

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇯🇵 Koki Niwa
78.5

Niwa leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories. Olympic team silver medallist in Rio 2016 and a multiple Japanese champion.

1. Koki Niwa
78.5
2. Chen Meng
78.3

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇯🇵 Koki Niwa5 seasons played · career day 1,825342 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇨🇳 Chen Meng5 seasons played · career day 4,38230 titles
-91.2% vs Niwa at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇯🇵 Niwa0050110342700
🇨🇳 Chen Meng000009

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricNiwaActiveChen MengActive
Olympic medals1
World Championship team medals4
Japanese national titles2
Career high world ranking6
Years at the top level15
Olympic golds3
World Championship titles3
World Cup titles2
World team titles3
Months at No. 130
WTT titles20
Dominance w25%7276
Peak w20%8486
Longevity w20%8272
Honours w20%7880
Statistics w15%7878

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Niwa78.5
Chen Meng78.3
The people
Niwa
Chen Meng

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Niwa vs Chen Meng. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →