GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Kong Linghui vs Wang M.

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
Kong LinghuiWinner
73.8

Kong Linghui wins: Longevity, Honours

Wang M.
71.8

Wang M. wins: Peak, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Table Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/kong-linghui-vs-wang-manyu

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇳 Kong Linghui
73.8

Kong Linghui leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Grand Slam winner and the last great two-winged looper of his generation.

1. Kong Linghui
73.8
2. Wang Manyu
71.8

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇨🇳 Kong Linghui5 seasons played · career day 2,92123 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇨🇳 Wang Manyu5 seasons played · career day 2,55612 titles
-47.8% vs Kong Linghui at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇨🇳 Kong Linghui0000829
🇨🇳 Wang M.0000620

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricKong LinghuiRetiredWang M.Active
Olympic golds22
World Championship titles3
World Cup titles11
Grand Slams completed1
World team titles3
ITTF Tour titles12
World titles1
World Tour titles10
Best world ranking1
Dominance w25%7272
Peak w20%7882
Longevity w20%7058
Honours w20%7672
Statistics w15%7376

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Kong Linghui73.8
Wang M.71.8
The people
Kong Linghui
Wang M.

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Kong Linghui vs Wang M.. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →