Who is better, Ender or King?
Kornelia Ender leads with a GOAT score of 87.2 against 87.1 for Lilly King — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Ender vs King
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Kornelia Ender above Lilly King: 87.2 vs 87.1. Kornelia Ender leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. Lilly King leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
EnderWinner
87.2Ender wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
King
87.1King wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to SwimmingShareable URL · /compare/kornelia-ender-vs-lilly-king
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇩🇪 Kornelia Ender
87.2
Ender leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Kornelia Ender
2. Lilly King
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇩🇪 Kornelia Ender5 seasons played · career day 1,825403 major golds
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Lilly King5 seasons played · career day 1,82614 major golds
-96.5% vs Ender at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇪 Ender | 0 | 0 | 55 | 127 | 403 | 612 |
| 🇺🇸 King | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 12 | 26 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Ender87.2
King87.1
FAQ
Where does King beat Ender?
King scores higher on longevity. Ender leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
How is the Ender vs King score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Ender: 87.2, King: 87.1.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Ender vs King. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.