Who is better, Akabusi or Williams?
Kriss Akabusi leads with a GOAT score of 83.1 against 83.1 for Randy Williams — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Kriss Akabusi and Randy Williams level at 83.1. Kriss Akabusi leads on Honours, Statistics, Longevity. Randy Williams leads on Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Akabusi wins: Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Williams wins: Dominance, Peak
Shareable URL · /compare/kriss-akabusi-vs-randy-williams
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Akabusi leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Akabusi | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50.2 | 197.8 | 391.06 |
| 🇺🇸 Williams | 0 | 0 | 45 | 143 | 401 | 660 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AkabusiRetired | WilliamsRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship golds | 1 | — |
| Olympic medals | 2 | — |
| European titles | 1 | — |
| 400 m hurdles best | 47.82 | — |
| Commonwealth medals | 4 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 1 |
| Olympic silver medals | — | 1 |
| Personal best in centimetres | — | 835 |
| US titles | — | 2 |
| Olympic Games contested | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 84 |
Kriss Akabusi leads with a GOAT score of 83.1 against 83.1 for Randy Williams — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Williams scores higher on peak, dominance. Akabusi leads on honours, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Akabusi: 83.1, Williams: 83.1.
Make your case for Akabusi vs Williams. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.