Who is better, Akabusi or Cram?
Kriss Akabusi leads with a GOAT score of 83.1 against 83.0 for Steve Cram — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Akabusi vs Cram
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Kriss Akabusi above Steve Cram: 83.1 vs 83.0. Kriss Akabusi leads on Longevity, Honours, Statistics. Steve Cram leads on Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
AkabusiWinner
83.1Akabusi wins: Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Cram
83.0Cram wins: Dominance
Candidates
Locked to AthleticsShareable URL · /compare/kriss-akabusi-vs-steve-cram
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Kriss Akabusi
83.1
Akabusi leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Kriss Akabusi
2. Steve Cram
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇬🇧 Kriss Akabusi5 seasons played · career day 2,191246.4 major golds
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 Steve Cram5 seasons played · career day 2,55613 major golds
-94.7% vs Akabusi at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Akabusi | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50.2 | 197.8 | 391.06 |
| 🇬🇧 Cram | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 22 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Akabusi83.1
Cram83.0
FAQ
Where does Cram beat Akabusi?
Cram scores higher on dominance. Akabusi leads on honours, statistics, longevity.
How is the Akabusi vs Cram score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Akabusi: 83.1, Cram: 83.0.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Akabusi vs Cram. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.