Who is better, KSCERATO or xNova?
xNova leads with a GOAT score of 82.7 against 82.6 for Kaike Cerato — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks xNova above Kaike Cerato: 82.7 vs 82.6. xNova leads on Honours, Longevity. Kaike Cerato leads on Statistics, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →xNova wins: Longevity, Honours
KSCERATO wins: Peak, Statistics
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
xNova leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇧🇷 KSCERATO | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.11 | 4.6 | 9.18 |
| 🇨🇳 xNova | 0 | 0 | 52 | 114 | 360 | 697 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | KSCERATOActive | xNovaActive |
|---|---|---|
| Top-20 player rankings | 6 | — |
| Big event finals | 6 | — |
| Career rating | 1.15 | — |
| Major playoff appearances | 5 | — |
| Best year ranking | 5 | — |
| TI finals | — | 2 |
| Major titles | — | 2 |
| TI appearances | — | 5 |
| Premier tournament wins | — | 5 |
| Career prize money (USD m) | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 76 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 82 |
xNova leads with a GOAT score of 82.7 against 82.6 for Kaike Cerato — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
KSCERATO scores higher on peak, statistics. xNova leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. KSCERATO: 82.6, xNova: 82.7.
Make your case for KSCERATO vs xNova. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.