Who is better, Warner or Jackson?
Kurt Warner leads with a GOAT score of 78.8 against 61.7 for Lamar Jackson — a gap of 17.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Warner wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Jackson wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/kurt-warner-vs-ros-lamar-jackson
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Warner leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Warner | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4,353 | 12,055 | 18,240 |
| 🏳️ Jackson | 0 | 0 | 1,896 | 6,229 | 16,646 | 29,130 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | WarnerRetired | JacksonActive · Baltimore Ravens |
|---|---|---|
| Super Bowl titles | 1 | — |
| League MVP awards | 2 | — |
| Super Bowl MVP awards | 1 | — |
| Passing yards | 32,344 | — |
| Career passer rating | 93.7 | — |
| NFL games | — | 116 |
| NFL yards | — | 29,130 |
| NFL award: NFL MVP | — | 2 |
| NFL award: Heisman Trophy | — | 1 |
| NFL award: Maxwell Award | — | 1 |
| NFL award: Walter Camp Award | — | 1 |
| Heisman Trophy | — | 1 |
| Maxwell Award | — | 1 |
| Walter Camp Award | — | 1 |
| The Sporting News College Football Player of the Year | — | 1 |
| ACC Athlete of the Year | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 62.1 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 74.3 |
| Longevity w20% | 66 | 50.6 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 50 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 74.5 |
Kurt Warner leads with a GOAT score of 78.8 against 61.7 for Lamar Jackson — a gap of 17.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Jackson does not lead any of the five categories; Warner is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Warner: 78.8, Jackson: 61.7.
Make your case for Warner vs Jackson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.