Who is better, Irving or Maravich?
Pete Maravich leads with a GOAT score of 81.5 against 81.4 for Kyrie Irving — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Pete Maravich above Kyrie Irving: 81.5 vs 81.4. Pete Maravich leads on Peak, Dominance, Statistics. Kyrie Irving leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Maravich wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Irving wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/kyrie-irving-vs-pete-maravich
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Maravich leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Irving | 0 | 0 | 18.5 | 41 | 103.1 | 203.9 |
| 🇺🇸 Maravich | 0 | 0 | 55 | 117 | 345 | 684 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | IrvingActive · Dallas Mavericks | MaravichRetired |
|---|---|---|
| NBA titles | 1 | — |
| All-Star selections | 9 | 5 |
| Olympic golds | 2 | — |
| Points per game | 23.4 | — |
| World Cup MVP awards | 1 | — |
| Scoring titles | — | 1 |
| Career points per game | — | 24.2 |
| College points per game | — | 44.2 |
| Seasons played | — | 10 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 68 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 90 |
Pete Maravich leads with a GOAT score of 81.5 against 81.4 for Kyrie Irving — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Irving scores higher on honours, longevity. Maravich leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Irving: 81.4, Maravich: 81.5.
Make your case for Irving vs Maravich. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.