Who is better, Gibbs or Schutt?
Megan Schutt leads with a GOAT score of 89.2 against 88.8 for Lance Gibbs — a gap of 0.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Gibbs vs Schutt
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Megan Schutt above Lance Gibbs: 89.2 vs 88.8. Megan Schutt leads on Honours. Lance Gibbs leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
SchuttWinner
89.2Schutt wins: Honours
Gibbs
88.8Gibbs wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/lance-gibbs-vs-megan-schutt
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇦🇺 Megan Schutt
89.2
Schutt leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Megan Schutt
2. Lance Gibbs
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇦🇺 Megan Schutt5 years played · career day 2,191108 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🏴 Lance Gibbs5 years played · career day 3,65190 runs
-16.7% vs Schutt at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏴 Gibbs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 68 |
| 🇦🇺 Schutt | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 52 | 202 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | GibbsRetired | SchuttActive |
|---|---|---|
| Test wickets | 309 | — |
| Test bowling average | 29.09 | — |
| Tests played | 79 | — |
| Five-wicket hauls | 18 | — |
| First-class wickets | 1,024 | — |
| World Cup titles | — | 2 |
| T20 World Cup titles | — | 3 |
| ODI wickets | — | 150 |
| T20I wickets | — | 140 |
| ODI hat-tricks | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 90 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 92 |
| Statistics w15% | 94 | 94 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Schutt89.2
Gibbs88.8
FAQ
Where does Gibbs beat Schutt?
Gibbs scores higher on longevity. Schutt leads on honours.
How is the Gibbs vs Schutt score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Gibbs: 88.8, Schutt: 89.2.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Gibbs vs Schutt. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.