Who is better, Myricks or Al-Asmari?
Larry Myricks leads with a GOAT score of 84.0 against 84.0 for Saad Al-Asmari — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Larry Myricks and Saad Al-Asmari level at 84.0. Larry Myricks leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics. Saad Al-Asmari leads on Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Myricks wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Al-Asmari wins: Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/larry-myricks-vs-saad-al-asmari
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Myricks leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Myricks | 0 | 0 | 40 | 85 | 190 | 540 |
| 🇸🇦 Al-Asmari | 0 | 0 | 52 | 110 | 317 | 661 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | MyricksRetired | Al-AsmariRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic medals | 1 | — |
| World Championship medals | 2 | — |
| Personal best in centimetres | 867 | — |
| US titles | 6 | — |
| World Indoor titles | 1 | — |
| Asian Games gold medals | — | 2 |
| Asian Championship gold medals | — | 3 |
| Personal best (min:s) | — | 8.11 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 3 |
| World Championship finals | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 86 |
Larry Myricks leads with a GOAT score of 84.0 against 84.0 for Saad Al-Asmari — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Al-Asmari scores higher on honours. Myricks leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Myricks: 84.0, Al-Asmari: 84.0.
Make your case for Myricks vs Al-Asmari. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.