Who is better, Muir or Adeniken?
Laura Muir leads with a GOAT score of 79.5 against 79.3 for Olapade Adeniken — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Laura Muir above Olapade Adeniken: 79.5 vs 79.3. Laura Muir leads on Dominance, Longevity, Honours. Olapade Adeniken leads on Statistics, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Muir wins: Dominance, Longevity, Honours
Adeniken wins: Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/laura-muir-vs-olapade-adeniken
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Muir leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Muir | 0 | 0 | 62 | 132 | 386 | 732 |
| 🇳🇬 Adeniken | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20.3 | 80.45 | 161.85 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | MuirActive | AdenikenRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic silver medals | 1 | — |
| European Championship golds | 2 | — |
| European Indoor golds | 5 | — |
| World Championship medals | 2 | 2 |
| British record 1500 m | 3.553 | — |
| Olympic medals | — | 1 |
| 200 m personal best | — | 19.95 |
| 100 m personal best | — | 10.02 |
| African Championship medals | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 72 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 76 |
| Statistics w15% | 78 | 86 |
Laura Muir leads with a GOAT score of 79.5 against 79.3 for Olapade Adeniken — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Adeniken scores higher on peak, statistics. Muir leads on dominance, honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Muir: 79.5, Adeniken: 79.3.
Make your case for Muir vs Adeniken. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.