Who is better, Muir or Van Balkom?
Laura Muir leads with a GOAT score of 79.5 against 79.4 for Patrick van Balkom — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Laura Muir above Patrick van Balkom: 79.5 vs 79.4. Laura Muir leads on Dominance, Peak. Patrick van Balkom leads on Statistics, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Muir wins: Dominance, Peak
Van Balkom wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/laura-muir-vs-patrick-van-balkom
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Muir leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Muir | 0 | 0 | 62 | 132 | 386 | 732 |
| 🇳🇱 Van Balkom | 0 | 0 | 50 | 107 | 316 | 642 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | MuirActive | Van BalkomRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic silver medals | 1 | — |
| European Championship golds | 2 | — |
| European Indoor golds | 5 | — |
| World Championship medals | 2 | — |
| British record 1500 m | 3.553 | — |
| European Championship medals | — | 1 |
| Dutch titles | — | 8 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 2 |
| Personal best 200 m (s) | — | 20.51 |
| National records | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 72 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 84 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 78 | 84 |
Laura Muir leads with a GOAT score of 79.5 against 79.4 for Patrick van Balkom — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Van Balkom scores higher on statistics, longevity. Muir leads on peak, dominance.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Muir: 79.5, Van Balkom: 79.4.
Make your case for Muir vs Van Balkom. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.