Who is better, Hemp or Larsson?
Sebastian Larsson leads with a GOAT score of 81.2 against 81.1 for Lauren Hemp — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Sebastian Larsson above Lauren Hemp: 81.2 vs 81.1. Sebastian Larsson leads on Longevity, Statistics. Lauren Hemp leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Larsson wins: Longevity, Statistics
Hemp wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/lauren-hemp-vs-sebastian-larsson-v
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Larsson leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏴 Hemp | 0 | 0 | 6 | 16 | 37 | 97 |
| 🇸🇪 Larsson | 0 | 0 | 48 | 100 | 282 | 583 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | HempActive | LarssonRetired |
|---|---|---|
| European Championship titles | 2 | — |
| PFA Young Player of the Year awards | 4 | — |
| England caps | 75 | — |
| England goals | 20 | — |
| FA Cup titles | 1 | — |
| Sweden caps | — | 133 |
| Premier League appearances | — | 300 |
| Swedish titles | — | 2 |
| Sweden goals | — | 10 |
| Major tournaments | — | 5 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 84 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 76 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 84 |
Sebastian Larsson leads with a GOAT score of 81.2 against 81.1 for Lauren Hemp — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Hemp scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Larsson leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Hemp: 81.1, Larsson: 81.2.
Make your case for Hemp vs Larsson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.