Who is better, L. Doherty or R. Doherty?
Laurence Doherty leads with a GOAT score of 89.2 against 87.9 for Reginald Doherty — a gap of 1.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Laurence Doherty above Reginald Doherty: 89.2 vs 87.9. Laurence Doherty leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. Reginald Doherty leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →L. Doherty wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
R. Doherty wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/laurence-doherty-vs-reginald-doherty
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
L. Doherty leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏴 L. Doherty | 0 | 0 | 40 | 88 | 283 | 631 |
| 🏴 R. Doherty | 0 | 0 | 40 | 91 | 314 | 710 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | L. DohertyRetired | R. DohertyRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Wimbledon singles titles | 5 | 4 |
| US Championships | 1 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | 3 | 3 |
| Davis Cup titles | 4 | 4 |
| Major doubles titles | 8 | — |
| Wimbledon doubles titles | — | 8 |
| Major finals | — | 8 |
| Dominance w25% | 92 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 92 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 90 |
Loading votes
Create a free account to vote and comment.
Sign in to voteLaurence Doherty leads with a GOAT score of 89.2 against 87.9 for Reginald Doherty — a gap of 1.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
R. Doherty scores higher on longevity. L. Doherty leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. L. Doherty: 89.2, R. Doherty: 87.9.
Make your case for L. Doherty vs R. Doherty. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.