GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

McCarter vs Wolfe

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
McCarterWinner
85.3

McCarter wins: Longevity

Wolfe
85.1

Wolfe wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Boxing

Shareable URL · /compare/layla-mccarter-vs-ann-wolfe

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Layla McCarter
85.3

McCarter leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories. Multi-division champion who campaigned for three-minute rounds in women's boxing.

1. Layla McCarter
85.3
2. Ann Wolfe
85.1

Category breakdown

Season form · Form index per season

Career timeline · Form index per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Form index per season
1. 🇺🇸 Ann Wolfe5 years played · career day 1,82520 title wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Layla McCarter5 years played · career day 1,82516 title wins
-20.0% vs Wolfe at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇺🇸 McCarter00371625
🇺🇸 Wolfe00492024

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricMcCarterActiveWolfeRetired
World titles4
Professional wins4224
Professional bouts50
Career span in years27
Career knockouts10
Weight classes with world titles4
Knockout wins16
Professional losses1
World title fights10
Dominance w25%8086
Peak w20%9094
Longevity w20%9272
Honours w20%8086
Statistics w15%8688

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
McCarter85.3
Wolfe85.1
The people
McCarter
Wolfe

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for McCarter vs Wolfe. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →