Who is better, Constantine or Chapman?
Learie Constantine leads with a GOAT score of 82.2 against 82.2 for Percy Chapman — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Learie Constantine and Percy Chapman level at 82.2. Learie Constantine leads on Dominance, Peak, Longevity. Percy Chapman leads on Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Constantine wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Chapman wins: Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/learie-constantine-vs-percy-chapman
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Constantine leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇹🇹 Constantine | 0 | 0 | 40 | 88 | 277 | 623 |
| 🇬🇧 Chapman | 0 | 0 | 45 | 97 | 222 | 645 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ConstantineRetired | ChapmanRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Test wickets | 58 | — |
| First-class wickets | 439 | — |
| First-class runs | 4,475 | 16,309 |
| Tests played | 18 | — |
| League seasons | 10 | — |
| Ashes series won as captain | — | 2 |
| Tests as captain | — | 17 |
| Tests won as captain | — | 9 |
| Test centuries | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 82 |
Learie Constantine leads with a GOAT score of 82.2 against 82.2 for Percy Chapman — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Chapman scores higher on honours. Constantine leads on peak, dominance, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Constantine: 82.2, Chapman: 82.2.
Make your case for Constantine vs Chapman. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.