Who is better, Ledecky or Fields?
Katie Ledecky leads with a GOAT score of 94.8 against 29.4 for Rick Fields — a gap of 65.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Ledecky vs Fields
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Katie Ledecky above Rick Fields: 94.8 vs 29.4. Katie Ledecky leads on Dominance, Honours, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
LedeckyWinner
94.8Ledecky wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Fields
29.4Fields wins: no category outright
Candidates
Locked to SwimmingShareable URL · /compare/ledecky-vs-nl-rick-fields
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Katie Ledecky
94.8
Ledecky leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Fields — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
1. Katie Ledecky
2. Rick Fields
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Through age 21 · Form index per season
1. 🇺🇸 Katie Ledecky636 major golds
7 seasons by age 21 · 90.9 per season
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Fields — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Ledecky94.8
Fields29.4
FAQ
Where does Fields beat Ledecky?
Fields does not lead any of the five categories; Ledecky is ahead or level on all of them.
How is the Ledecky vs Fields score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Ledecky: 94.8, Fields: 29.4.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Ledecky vs Fields. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.