Who is better, Jones or Lochte?
Ryan Lochte leads with a GOAT score of 86.1 against 85.8 for Leisel Jones — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Jones vs Lochte
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Ryan Lochte above Leisel Jones: 86.1 vs 85.8. Ryan Lochte leads on Longevity, Honours. Leisel Jones leads on Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
LochteWinner
86.1Lochte wins: Longevity, Honours
Jones
85.8Jones wins: Dominance, Peak
Candidates
Locked to SwimmingShareable URL · /compare/leisel-jones-vs-ryan-lochte
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Ryan Lochte
86.1
Lochte leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Ryan Lochte
2. Leisel Jones
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Ryan Lochte5 seasons played · career day 1,826582.6 major golds
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇦🇺 Leisel Jones5 seasons played · career day 2,55613 major golds
-97.8% vs Lochte at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇺 Jones | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 22 |
| 🇺🇸 Lochte | 0 | 0 | 118 | 235 | 467.3 | 1,040.97 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Lochte86.1
Jones85.8
FAQ
Where does Jones beat Lochte?
Jones scores higher on peak, dominance. Lochte leads on honours, longevity.
How is the Jones vs Lochte score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Jones: 85.8, Lochte: 86.1.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Jones vs Lochte. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.