Who is better, Hutton or Hammond?
Wally Hammond leads with a GOAT score of 93.0 against 90.9 for Len Hutton — a gap of 2.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Hutton vs Hammond
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Wally Hammond above Len Hutton: 93.0 vs 90.9. Wally Hammond leads on Longevity, Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
HammondWinner
93.0Hammond wins: Dominance, Longevity, Honours
Hutton
90.9Hutton wins: no category outright
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/len-hutton-vs-wally-hammond
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Wally Hammond
93.0
Hammond leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Wally Hammond
2. Len Hutton
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇬🇧 Wally Hammond5 years played · career day 4,382340 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 Len Hutton5 years played · career day 2,921310 runs
-8.8% vs Hammond at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Hutton | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 130 | 380 |
| 🇬🇧 Hammond | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 150 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Hammond93.0
Hutton90.9
FAQ
Where does Hutton beat Hammond?
Hutton does not lead any of the five categories; Hammond is ahead or level on all of them.
How is the Hutton vs Hammond score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Hutton: 90.9, Hammond: 93.0.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Hutton vs Hammond. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.