Who is better, Goeßling or Milla?
Lena Goeßling leads with a GOAT score of 86.1 against 86.0 for Roger Milla — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Lena Goeßling above Roger Milla: 86.1 vs 86.0. Lena Goeßling leads on Honours, Dominance. Roger Milla leads on Longevity, Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Goeßling wins: Dominance, Honours
Milla wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/lena-goessling-v-vs-roger-milla
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Goeßling leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇪 Goeßling | 0 | 0 | 52 | 109 | 236 | 632 |
| 🇨🇲 Milla | 0 | 0 | 45 | 93 | 251 | 497 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | GoeßlingRetired | MillaRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 1 | — |
| Champions League titles | 2 | — |
| European Championship titles | 1 | — |
| Bundesliga titles | 5 | — |
| Germany caps | 107 | — |
| African Footballer of the Year awards | — | 2 |
| Africa Cup of Nations titles | — | 2 |
| World Cup goals | — | 5 |
| Cameroon caps | — | 102 |
| Seasons played | — | 27 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 89 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 92 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 86 |
Lena Goeßling leads with a GOAT score of 86.1 against 86.0 for Roger Milla — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Milla scores higher on peak, statistics, longevity. Goeßling leads on dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Goeßling: 86.1, Milla: 86.0.
Make your case for Goeßling vs Milla. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.