Who is better, Videkull or MacMillan?
Lena Videkull leads with a GOAT score of 84.2 against 84.2 for Shannon MacMillan — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Lena Videkull and Shannon MacMillan level at 84.2. Lena Videkull leads on Statistics, Dominance, Peak. Shannon MacMillan leads on Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Videkull wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
MacMillan wins: Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/lena-videkull-v-vs-shannon-macmillan-v
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Videkull leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 Videkull | 0 | 0 | 52 | 111 | 329 | 665 |
| 🇺🇸 MacMillan | 0 | 0 | 55 | 117 | 349 | 677 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | VidekullRetired | MacMillanRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden caps | 123 | — |
| Sweden goals | 71 | — |
| World Cup appearances | 2 | — |
| Damallsvenskan titles | 3 | — |
| Damallsvenskan goals | 150 | — |
| World Cup titles | — | 1 |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 1 |
| United States caps | — | 176 |
| United States goals | — | 60 |
| US Player of the Year awards | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 89 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 84 |
Lena Videkull leads with a GOAT score of 84.2 against 84.2 for Shannon MacMillan — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
MacMillan scores higher on honours. Videkull leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Videkull: 84.2, MacMillan: 84.2.
Make your case for Videkull vs MacMillan. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.