Who is better, Lewis or Crawford?
Lennox Lewis leads with a GOAT score of 86.4 against 86.4 for Terence Crawford — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Lennox Lewis and Terence Crawford level at 86.4. Lennox Lewis leads on Longevity, Honours. Terence Crawford leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Lewis wins: Longevity, Honours
Crawford wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/lennox-lewis-vs-terence-crawford
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Lewis leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Lewis | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 15 | 25 |
| 🇺🇸 Crawford | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 12 | 27 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | LewisRetired | CrawfordActive |
|---|---|---|
| World titles | 3 | — |
| Olympic golds | 1 | — |
| Career wins | 41 | — |
| Knockouts | 32 | — |
| Undisputed reigns | 1 | — |
| Title defences | 14 | — |
| Professional wins | — | 41 |
| Career losses | — | 0 |
| Wins by knockout | — | 31 |
| World titles in weight classes | — | 4 |
| Undisputed titles | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 88 |
Lennox Lewis leads with a GOAT score of 86.4 against 86.4 for Terence Crawford — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Crawford scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Lewis leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Lewis: 86.4, Crawford: 86.4.
Make your case for Lewis vs Crawford. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.