Who is better, Richter or Willis?
Patrick Willis leads with a GOAT score of 82.2 against 82.0 for Les Richter — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Patrick Willis above Les Richter: 82.2 vs 82.0. Patrick Willis leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak. Les Richter leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Willis wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Richter wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/les-richter-vs-patrick-willis
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Willis leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Richter | 0 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 22 | 35 |
| 🇺🇸 Willis | 0 | 0 | 174 | 315 | 692 | 911 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | RichterRetired | WillisRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Pro Bowls | 8 | — |
| Career interceptions | 16 | — |
| Games played | 112 | — |
| Seasons played | 9 | — |
| Hall of Fame inductions | 1 | — |
| Pro Bowl selections | — | 7 |
| First-team All-Pro selections | — | 5 |
| Career tackles | — | 950 |
| Defensive Rookie of the Year awards | — | 1 |
| Super Bowl appearances | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 68 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 86 |
Patrick Willis leads with a GOAT score of 82.2 against 82.0 for Les Richter — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Richter scores higher on statistics, longevity. Willis leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Richter: 82.0, Willis: 82.2.
Make your case for Richter vs Willis. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.