Who is better, Jenkins or Judah?
Lew Jenkins leads with a GOAT score of 82.7 against 82.7 for Zab Judah — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Jenkins vs Judah
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Lew Jenkins and Zab Judah level at 82.7. Lew Jenkins leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. Zab Judah leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
JenkinsWinner
82.7Jenkins wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Judah
82.7Judah wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to BoxingShareable URL · /compare/lew-jenkins-vs-zab-judah
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Lew Jenkins
82.7
Jenkins leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Lew Jenkins
2. Zab Judah
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Lew Jenkins5 years played · career day 1,825327 title wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Zab Judah5 years played · career day 1,82623 title wins
-93.0% vs Jenkins at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Jenkins | 0 | 0 | 45 | 100 | 327 | 671 |
| 🇺🇸 Judah | 0 | 0 | 6 | 11 | 20 | 33 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Jenkins82.7
Judah82.7
FAQ
Where does Judah beat Jenkins?
Judah scores higher on longevity. Jenkins leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
How is the Jenkins vs Judah score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Jenkins: 82.7, Judah: 82.7.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Jenkins vs Judah. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.