Who is better, Lewandowski or Maldini?
Robert Lewandowski leads with a GOAT score of 88.8 against 88.8 for Paolo Maldini — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Robert Lewandowski and Paolo Maldini level at 88.8. Robert Lewandowski leads on Statistics, Peak. Paolo Maldini leads on Longevity, Honours, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Lewandowski wins: Peak, Statistics
Maldini wins: Dominance, Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/lewandowski-vs-maldini
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Lewandowski leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇵🇱 Lewandowski | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 48 | 155 |
| 🇮🇹 Maldini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32 | 106 | 308 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | LewandowskiActive | MaldiniRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Career goals | 700 | 40 |
| Bundesliga goals | 312 | — |
| Champions League titles | 1 | 5 |
| League titles | 12 | — |
| FIFA Best awards | 2 | — |
| Golden Boots | 2 | — |
| Appearances | — | 902 |
| Serie A titles | — | 7 |
| International caps | — | 126 |
| Champions League appearances | — | 174 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 87 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 87 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 96 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 89 |
| Statistics w15% | 94 | 84 |
Robert Lewandowski leads with a GOAT score of 88.8 against 88.8 for Paolo Maldini — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Maldini scores higher on dominance, honours, longevity. Lewandowski leads on peak, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Lewandowski: 88.8, Maldini: 88.8.
Make your case for Lewandowski vs Maldini. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.