GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Li Ju vs Gergely

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
Li JuWinner
81.9

Li Ju wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics

Gergely
81.9

Gergely wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Table Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/li-ju-vs-gabor-gergely-tt

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇳 Li Ju
81.9

Li Ju leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Olympic doubles champion in Sydney 2000 and a world doubles champion.

1. Li Ju
81.9
2. Gábor Gergely
81.9

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇨🇳 Li Ju5 seasons played · career day 1,825388 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇭🇺 Gábor Gergely5 seasons played · career day 1,825293 titles
-24.5% vs Li Ju at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇨🇳 Li Ju0058128388732
🇭🇺 Gergely0048101293622

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricLi JuRetiredGergelyRetired
Olympic gold medals1
Olympic medals2
World Championship titles3
World Cup medals1
Years at the top level10
World team titles1
European Championship titles2
World Championship medals3
National titles8
Career world ranking best6
Dominance w25%8078
Peak w20%9086
Longevity w20%7282
Honours w20%8684
Statistics w15%8280

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Li Ju81.9
Gergely81.9
The people
Li Ju
Gergely

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Li Ju vs Gergely. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →