GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Li Xiaoxia vs Samsonov

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
Li XiaoxiaWinner
78.3

Li Xiaoxia wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics

Samsonov
74.5

Samsonov wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Table Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/li-xiaoxia-vs-samsonov

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇳 Li Xiaoxia
78.3

Li Xiaoxia leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Grand Slam winner with Olympic, world and World Cup singles titles.

1. Li Xiaoxia
78.3
2. Vladimir Samsonov
74.5

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇨🇳 Li Xiaoxia5 seasons played · career day 4,38230 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇧🇾 Vladimir Samsonov5 seasons played · career day 3,28623 titles
-23.3% vs Li Xiaoxia at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇨🇳 Li Xiaoxia000009
🇧🇾 Samsonov0000323

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricLi XiaoxiaRetiredSamsonovRetired
Olympic golds2
World Championship singles titles2
World Cup titles13
Grand Slams completed1
World team titles4
Months at No. 112
European Championship singles titles3
World Championship medals2
Olympic appearances6
Best world ranking1
Years at top level30
Dominance w25%7666
Peak w20%8478
Longevity w20%7490
Honours w20%8068
Statistics w15%7872

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Li Xiaoxia78.3
Samsonov74.5
The people
Li Xiaoxia
Samsonov

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Li Xiaoxia vs Samsonov. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →