Who is better, Dawson or Cuttell?
Willis Cuttell leads with a GOAT score of 77.5 against 74.9 for Liam Dawson — a gap of 2.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Dawson vs Cuttell
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Willis Cuttell above Liam Dawson: 77.5 vs 74.9. Willis Cuttell leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak. Liam Dawson leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
CuttellWinner
77.5Cuttell wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Dawson
74.9Dawson wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/liam-dawson-vs-willis-cuttell
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Willis Cuttell
77.5
Cuttell leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Willis Cuttell
2. Liam Dawson
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇬🇧 Willis Cuttell5 years played · career day 4,016520 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🏴 Liam Dawson5 years played · career day 2,92193 runs
-82.1% vs Cuttell at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏴 Dawson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 128 |
| 🇬🇧 Cuttell | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 300 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Cuttell77.5
Dawson74.9
FAQ
Where does Dawson beat Cuttell?
Dawson scores higher on longevity. Cuttell leads on peak, dominance, honours.
How is the Dawson vs Cuttell score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Dawson: 74.9, Cuttell: 77.5.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Dawson vs Cuttell. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.