Who is better, Lidström or Esposito?
Tony Esposito leads with a GOAT score of 89.3 against 89.1 for Nicklas Lidström — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Tony Esposito above Nicklas Lidström: 89.3 vs 89.1. Tony Esposito leads on Peak, Statistics. Nicklas Lidström leads on Longevity, Honours, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Esposito wins: Peak, Statistics
Lidström wins: Dominance, Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/lidstrom-vs-tony-esposito
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Esposito leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 Lidström | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 60 | 307 |
| 🇨🇦 Esposito | 0 | 0 | 55 | 132 | 324 | 738 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | LidströmRetired | EspositoRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Norris Trophies | 7 | — |
| Stanley Cups | 4 | — |
| Conn Smythe Trophies | 1 | — |
| Olympic golds | 1 | — |
| NHL points | 1,142 | — |
| All-Star selections | 12 | — |
| Vezina Trophies | — | 3 |
| Career shutouts | — | 76 |
| Rookie-season shutouts | — | 15 |
| Career wins | — | 423 |
| Calder Trophies | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 87 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 96 |
| Longevity w20% | 94 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 92 |
Tony Esposito leads with a GOAT score of 89.3 against 89.1 for Nicklas Lidström — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Lidström scores higher on dominance, honours, longevity. Esposito leads on peak, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Lidström: 89.1, Esposito: 89.3.
Make your case for Lidström vs Esposito. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.