Who is better, Hurtig or Keane?
Lina Hurtig leads with a GOAT score of 81.3 against 81.3 for Roy Keane — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Lina Hurtig and Roy Keane level at 81.3. Lina Hurtig leads on Statistics. Roy Keane leads on Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Hurtig wins: Statistics
Keane wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/lina-hurtig-v-vs-roy-keane
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Hurtig leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇪 Hurtig | 0 | 0 | 50 | 105 | 230 | 630 |
| 🇮🇪 Keane | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 29 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | HurtigActive | KeaneRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic medals | 1 | — |
| World Cup medals | 1 | — |
| Sweden caps | 90 | — |
| League titles | 3 | — |
| Sweden goals | 20 | — |
| Premier League titles | — | 7 |
| Champions League titles | — | 1 |
| FA Cups | — | 4 |
| Appearances | — | 626 |
| PFA Player of the Year | — | 1 |
| Ireland caps | — | 67 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 78 |
Lina Hurtig leads with a GOAT score of 81.3 against 81.3 for Roy Keane — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Keane scores higher on dominance, honours. Hurtig leads on statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Hurtig: 81.3, Keane: 81.3.
Make your case for Hurtig vs Keane. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.