GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Conacher vs Hawerchuk

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
ConacherWinner
87.1

Conacher wins: Dominance, Honours

Hawerchuk
87.1

Hawerchuk wins: Longevity, Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Ice Hockey

Shareable URL · /compare/lionel-conacher-vs-dale-hawerchuk

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇦 Lionel Conacher
87.1

Conacher leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Canada's athlete of the half-century, with two Stanley Cups.

1. Lionel Conacher
87.1
2. Dale Hawerchuk
87.1

Category breakdown

Season form · Points per season

Career timeline · Points per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Points per season
1. 🇨🇦 Dale Hawerchuk5 seasons played · career day 1,825378 points
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇨🇦 Lionel Conacher5 seasons played · career day 1,825316 points
-16.4% vs Hawerchuk at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇨🇦 Conacher0050107316669
🇨🇦 Hawerchuk0055120378720

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricConacherRetiredHawerchukRetired
Stanley Cups2
Career points1731,409
All-star selections2
Games played498
Seasons played12
Career goals518
Calder Trophies1
100-point seasons6
Canada Cup titles1
Dominance w25%8684
Peak w20%9292
Longevity w20%8286
Honours w20%8882
Statistics w15%8894

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Conacher87.1
Hawerchuk87.1
The people
Conacher
Hawerchuk

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Conacher vs Hawerchuk. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →