GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Sthalekar vs Perry

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
SthalekarWinner
88.3

Sthalekar wins: Peak, Honours, Statistics

Perry
88.2

Perry wins: Dominance, Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/lisa-sthalekar-vs-ellyse-perry

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇦🇺 Lisa Sthalekar
88.3

Sthalekar leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. First woman to complete the ODI double of 1,000 runs and 100 wickets.

1. Lisa Sthalekar
88.3
2. Ellyse Perry
88.2

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇦🇺 Ellyse Perry5 years played · career day 2,921252 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇦🇺 Lisa Sthalekar5 years played · career day 1,825144 runs
-42.9% vs Perry at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇦🇺 Sthalekar001842144310
🇦🇺 Perry000085314

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricSthalekarRetiredPerryActive
World Cup titles27
T20 World Cup titles2
ODI wickets146
ODI runs2,728
ODI matches125
International wickets300
International runs7,000
Test double centuries1
ICC Cricketer of the Year2
Ashes series wins6
Dominance w25%8486
Peak w20%9290
Longevity w20%8488
Honours w20%9088
Statistics w15%9490

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Sthalekar88.3
Perry88.2
The people
Sthalekar
Perry

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Sthalekar vs Perry. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →