Who is better, Sthalekar or Jayawardene?
Lisa Sthalekar leads with a GOAT score of 88.3 against 88.3 for Mahela Jayawardene — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Lisa Sthalekar and Mahela Jayawardene level at 88.3. Lisa Sthalekar leads on Honours. Mahela Jayawardene leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Sthalekar wins: Honours
Jayawardene wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/lisa-sthalekar-vs-mahela-jayawardene
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Sthalekar leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇺 Sthalekar | 0 | 0 | 18 | 42 | 144 | 310 |
| 🇱🇰 Jayawardene | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 135 | 356 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | SthalekarRetired | JayawardeneRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Cup titles | 2 | — |
| T20 World Cup titles | 2 | — |
| ODI wickets | 146 | — |
| ODI runs | 2,728 | 12,650 |
| ODI matches | 125 | — |
| Test runs | — | 11,814 |
| Test centuries | — | 34 |
| Highest Test score | — | 374 |
| World T20 titles | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 90 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 94 | 94 |
Loading votes
Create a free account to vote and comment.
Sign in to voteLisa Sthalekar leads with a GOAT score of 88.3 against 88.3 for Mahela Jayawardene — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Jayawardene scores higher on longevity. Sthalekar leads on honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Sthalekar: 88.3, Jayawardene: 88.3.
Make your case for Sthalekar vs Jayawardene. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.