GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Liu Guoliang vs Wang

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
WangWinner
79.1

Wang wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics

Liu Guoliang
74.8

Liu Guoliang wins: Longevity

Candidates
Locked to Table Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/liu-guoliang-vs-wang-chuqin

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇳 Wang Chuqin
79.1

Wang leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Olympic mixed doubles and team champion and world No. 1.

1. Wang Chuqin
79.1
2. Liu Guoliang
74.8

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇨🇳 Liu Guoliang5 seasons played · career day 2,92122 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇨🇳 Wang Chuqin5 seasons played · career day 2,55617 titles
-22.7% vs Liu Guoliang at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇨🇳 Liu Guoliang0000625
🇨🇳 Wang0000528

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricLiu GuoliangRetiredWangActive
Olympic golds22
World Championship titles3
World Cup titles1
Grand Slams completed1
World team titles22
Asian Championship titles4
World Championship golds4
World No. 1 ranking1
World Tour/WTT titles20
Dominance w25%7484
Peak w20%8090
Longevity w20%6856
Honours w20%7880
Statistics w15%7486

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Wang79.1
Liu Guoliang74.8
The people
Liu Guoliang
Wang

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Liu Guoliang vs Wang. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →