Who is better, Cambage or Johnson?
Liz Cambage leads with a GOAT score of 78.2 against 78.1 for Marques Johnson — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Liz Cambage above Marques Johnson: 78.2 vs 78.1. Liz Cambage leads on Statistics, Peak. Marques Johnson leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Cambage wins: Peak, Statistics
Johnson wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/liz-cambage-vs-marques-johnson
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Cambage leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇺 Cambage | 0 | 0 | 12.5 | 26 | 76.5 | 119.7 |
| 🇺🇸 Johnson | 0 | 0 | 19.5 | 45.1 | 108.4 | 190.2 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | CambageRetired | JohnsonRetired |
|---|---|---|
| WNBA single-game points record | 53 | — |
| All-Star selections | 4 | — |
| Olympic medals | 1 | — |
| Points per game peak | 23 | — |
| WNBL titles | 2 | — |
| NBA All-Star selections | — | 5 |
| All-NBA selections | — | 3 |
| Career points | — | 13,892 |
| Career points per game | — | 20.1 |
| NCAA championships | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 68 | 72 |
| Honours w20% | 72 | 76 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 82 |
Liz Cambage leads with a GOAT score of 78.2 against 78.1 for Marques Johnson — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Johnson scores higher on honours, longevity. Cambage leads on peak, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Cambage: 78.2, Johnson: 78.1.
Make your case for Cambage vs Johnson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.