GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Hewitt vs Seixas

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
SeixasWinner
86.5

Seixas wins: Longevity, Honours, Statistics

Hewitt
85.9

Hewitt wins: Dominance, Peak

Candidates
Locked to Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/lleyton-hewitt-vs-vic-seixas

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Vic Seixas
86.5

Seixas leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Wimbledon and US Championships winner with 15 Grand Slam titles in all.

1. Vic Seixas
86.5
2. Lleyton Hewitt
85.9

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇦🇺 Lleyton Hewitt5 seasons played · career day 1,825327 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Vic Seixas5 seasons played · career day 5,47815 titles
-95.4% vs Hewitt at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇦🇺 Hewitt0045100327686
🇺🇸 Seixas000000

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricHewittRetiredSeixasRetired
Major singles titles2
Weeks at world number one80
Career singles titles30
Davis Cup titles21
Tour Finals titles2
Grand Slam singles titles2
Grand Slam doubles titles5
Grand Slam mixed titles8
Davis Cup ties played19
Dominance w25%8280
Peak w20%9290
Longevity w20%8690
Honours w20%8688
Statistics w15%8486

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Seixas86.5
Hewitt85.9
The people
Hewitt
Seixas

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Hewitt vs Seixas. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →