Who is better, Sargeant or Firman?
Ralph Firman leads with a GOAT score of 58.9 against 55.3 for Logan Sargeant — a gap of 3.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Ralph Firman above Logan Sargeant: 58.9 vs 55.3. Ralph Firman leads on Longevity, Honours, Dominance. Logan Sargeant leads on Statistics, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Firman wins: Dominance, Longevity, Honours
Sargeant wins: Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/logan-sargeant-vs-ralph-firman-f1v
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Firman leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Sargeant | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 🇮🇪 Firman | 0 | 0 | 38 | 81 | 243 | 509 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | SargeantRetired | FirmanRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Prix starts | 36 | — |
| Career points | 1 | — |
| Best race finish | 10 | — |
| Formula 3 wins | 3 | — |
| Seasons contested | 2 | — |
| Formula One starts | — | 14 |
| Formula One points | — | 1 |
| Japanese Formula Nippon titles | — | 1 |
| British F3 titles | — | 1 |
| Macau Grand Prix wins | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 48 | 52 |
| Peak w20% | 70 | 64 |
| Longevity w20% | 50 | 68 |
| Honours w20% | 44 | 54 |
| Statistics w15% | 70 | 58 |
Ralph Firman leads with a GOAT score of 58.9 against 55.3 for Logan Sargeant — a gap of 3.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Sargeant scores higher on peak, statistics. Firman leads on dominance, honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Sargeant: 55.3, Firman: 58.9.
Make your case for Sargeant vs Firman. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.