Who is better, Gallardo or Hamšík?
Lola Gallardo leads with a GOAT score of 80.6 against 80.6 for Marek Hamšík — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Lola Gallardo and Marek Hamšík level at 80.6. Lola Gallardo leads on Peak, Honours, Statistics. Marek Hamšík leads on Longevity, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Gallardo wins: Peak, Honours, Statistics
Hamšík wins: Dominance, Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/lola-gallardo-v-vs-marek-hamsik
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Gallardo leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇪🇸 Gallardo | 0 | 0 | 50 | 105 | 300 | 626 |
| 🇸🇰 Hamšík | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 23 | 79 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | GallardoActive | HamšíkRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Liga F titles | 2 | — |
| Spain caps | 30 | — |
| Zamora Trophy awards | 1 | — |
| World Cup appearances | 1 | — |
| Career appearances | 300 | — |
| Napoli goals | — | 121 |
| Napoli appearances | — | 520 |
| Slovakia caps | — | 138 |
| Coppa Italia titles | — | 3 |
| Slovak Footballer of the Year awards | — | 8 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 85 | 82 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 76 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 82 |
Lola Gallardo leads with a GOAT score of 80.6 against 80.6 for Marek Hamšík — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Hamšík scores higher on dominance, longevity. Gallardo leads on peak, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Gallardo: 80.6, Hamšík: 80.6.
Make your case for Gallardo vs Hamšík. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.