Who is better, Groza or Malone?
Lou Groza leads with a GOAT score of 92.4 against 18.1 for DeAngelo Malone — a gap of 74.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Groza vs Malone
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
GrozaWinner
92.4Groza wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Malone
18.1Malone wins: no category outright
Candidates
Locked to American FootballShareable URL · /compare/lou-groza-vs-ros-deangelo-malone
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Lou Groza
92.4
Groza leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Malone — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
1. Lou Groza
2. DeAngelo Malone
Category breakdown
Season form · Touchdowns per season
Career timeline · Touchdowns per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Touchdowns per season1. 🇺🇸 Lou Groza5 seasons played · career day 1,825308 touchdowns
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🏳️ DeAngelo Malone4 seasons played · career day 1,46059 touchdowns
-80.8% vs Groza at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Groza | 0 | 0 | 50 | 106 | 308 | 658 |
| 🏳️ Malone | 0 | 0 | 29 | 35 | 59 | 59 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Groza92.4
Malone18.1
FAQ
Where does Malone beat Groza?
Malone does not lead any of the five categories; Groza is ahead or level on all of them.
How is the Groza vs Malone score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Groza: 92.4, Malone: 18.1.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Groza vs Malone. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.