Who is better, Groza or Willis?
Lou Groza leads with a GOAT score of 92.4 against 17.9 for Malik Willis — a gap of 74.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Groza vs Willis
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
GrozaWinner
92.4Groza wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Willis
17.9Willis wins: no category outright
Candidates
Locked to American FootballShareable URL · /compare/lou-groza-vs-ros-malik-willis
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Lou Groza
92.4
Groza leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Willis — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
1. Lou Groza
2. Malik Willis
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🏳️ Malik Willis4 seasons played · career day 1,4601,727 touchdowns
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Lou Groza5 seasons played · career day 1,825308 touchdowns
-82.2% vs Willis at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Groza | 0 | 0 | 50 | 106 | 308 | 658 |
| 🏳️ Willis | 0 | 0 | 399 | 494 | 1,727 | 1,727 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Groza92.4
Willis17.9
FAQ
Where does Willis beat Groza?
Willis does not lead any of the five categories; Groza is ahead or level on all of them.
How is the Groza vs Willis score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Groza: 92.4, Willis: 17.9.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Groza vs Willis. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.