Who is better, Groza or Fitzpatrick?
Lou Groza leads with a GOAT score of 92.4 against 17.8 for Minkah Fitzpatrick — a gap of 74.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Lou Groza above Minkah Fitzpatrick: 92.4 vs 17.8. Lou Groza leads on Longevity, Honours, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Groza wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Fitzpatrick wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/lou-groza-vs-ros-minkah-fitzpatrick
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Groza leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Fitzpatrick — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Groza | 0 | 0 | 50 | 106 | 308 | 658 |
| 🏳️ Fitzpatrick | 0 | 0 | 80 | 218 | 517 | 759 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | GrozaRetired | FitzpatrickActive · New York Jets |
|---|---|---|
| League titles | 8 | — |
| Career points | 1,608 | — |
| Pro Bowls | 9 | — |
| Seasons played | 21 | — |
| Field goals made | 264 | — |
| NFL games | — | 120 |
| NFL tackles | — | 759 |
| Number | — | 29 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 17.9 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 22.5 |
| Longevity w20% | 98 | 15.9 |
| Honours w20% | 94 | 13.9 |
| Statistics w15% | 94 | 19.3 |
Lou Groza leads with a GOAT score of 92.4 against 17.8 for Minkah Fitzpatrick — a gap of 74.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Fitzpatrick does not lead any of the five categories; Groza is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Groza: 92.4, Fitzpatrick: 17.8.
Make your case for Groza vs Fitzpatrick. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.