Who is better, Groza or Rosengarten?
Lou Groza leads with a GOAT score of 92.4 against 12.7 for Roger Rosengarten — a gap of 79.7 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Lou Groza above Roger Rosengarten: 92.4 vs 12.7. Lou Groza leads on Longevity, Honours, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Groza wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Rosengarten wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/lou-groza-vs-ros-roger-rosengarten
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Groza leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Rosengarten — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Groza | 0 | 0 | 50 | 106 | 308 | 658 |
| 🏳️ Rosengarten | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | GrozaRetired | RosengartenActive · Baltimore Ravens |
|---|---|---|
| League titles | 8 | — |
| Career points | 1,608 | — |
| Pro Bowls | 9 | — |
| Seasons played | 21 | — |
| Field goals made | 264 | — |
| NFL games | — | 17 |
| NFL tackles | — | 1 |
| Number | — | 70 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 12.3 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 18.1 |
| Longevity w20% | 98 | 10.3 |
| Honours w20% | 94 | 8.3 |
| Statistics w15% | 94 | 15.5 |
Lou Groza leads with a GOAT score of 92.4 against 12.7 for Roger Rosengarten — a gap of 79.7 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Rosengarten does not lead any of the five categories; Groza is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Groza: 92.4, Rosengarten: 12.7.
Make your case for Groza vs Rosengarten. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.