Who is better, Groza or Mitchell-Paden?
Lou Groza leads with a GOAT score of 92.4 against 17.0 for Zaire Mitchell-Paden — a gap of 75.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Lou Groza above Zaire Mitchell-Paden: 92.4 vs 17.0. Lou Groza leads on Longevity, Honours, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Groza wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Mitchell-Paden wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/lou-groza-vs-ros-zaire-mitchell-paden
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Groza leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Mitchell-Paden — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Groza | 0 | 0 | 50 | 106 | 308 | 658 |
| 🏳️ Mitchell-Paden | 0 | 0 | 34 | 34 | 34 | 34 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | GrozaRetired | Mitchell-PadenActive · Houston Texans |
|---|---|---|
| League titles | 8 | — |
| Career points | 1,608 | — |
| Pro Bowls | 9 | — |
| Seasons played | 21 | — |
| Field goals made | 264 | — |
| NFL games | — | 8 |
| NFL yards | — | 34 |
| Number | — | 88 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 17 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 21.8 |
| Longevity w20% | 98 | 15 |
| Honours w20% | 94 | 13 |
| Statistics w15% | 94 | 18.7 |
Lou Groza leads with a GOAT score of 92.4 against 17.0 for Zaire Mitchell-Paden — a gap of 75.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Mitchell-Paden does not lead any of the five categories; Groza is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Groza: 92.4, Mitchell-Paden: 17.0.
Make your case for Groza vs Mitchell-Paden. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.