Who is better, Dampier or Thompson?
Louie Dampier leads with a GOAT score of 85.2 against 85.2 for Tina Thompson — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Louie Dampier and Tina Thompson level at 85.2. Louie Dampier leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics. Tina Thompson leads on Honours, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Dampier wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Thompson wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/louie-dampier-vs-tina-thompson
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Dampier leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Dampier | 0 | 0 | 20.6 | 45.4 | 114.9 | 175.4 |
| 🇺🇸 Thompson | 0 | 0 | 7.1 | 22.6 | 77.6 | 147 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | DampierRetired | ThompsonRetired |
|---|---|---|
| ABA championships | 1 | — |
| ABA All-Star selections | 7 | — |
| ABA career points | 13,726 | — |
| ABA career assists | 4,044 | — |
| ABA three-pointers made | 794 | — |
| WNBA titles | — | 4 |
| Career points | — | 7,488 |
| All-Star selections | — | 9 |
| Olympic golds | — | 2 |
| Seasons played | — | 17 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 88 |
Louie Dampier leads with a GOAT score of 85.2 against 85.2 for Tina Thompson — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Thompson scores higher on honours, longevity. Dampier leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Dampier: 85.2, Thompson: 85.2.
Make your case for Dampier vs Thompson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.