Who is better, Rijker or Briggs?
Lucia Rijker leads with a GOAT score of 79.1 against 79.1 for Shannon Briggs — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Lucia Rijker and Shannon Briggs level at 79.1. Lucia Rijker leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. Shannon Briggs leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Rijker wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Briggs wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/lucia-rijker-vs-shannon-briggs
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Rijker leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇳🇱 Rijker | 0 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 12 | 17 |
| 🇺🇸 Briggs | 0 | 0 | 48 | 102 | 228 | 592 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | RijkerRetired | BriggsRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Professional boxing wins | 17 | — |
| Boxing losses | 0 | — |
| Knockouts | 14 | 53 |
| Kickboxing record wins | 37 | — |
| Kickboxing world titles | 4 | — |
| World titles won | — | 1 |
| Lineal championships | — | 1 |
| Professional wins | — | 60 |
| Professional years | — | 25 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 70 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 62 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 74 | 70 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 88 |
Lucia Rijker leads with a GOAT score of 79.1 against 79.1 for Shannon Briggs — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Briggs scores higher on statistics, longevity. Rijker leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Rijker: 79.1, Briggs: 79.1.
Make your case for Rijker vs Briggs. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.